Showing posts with label Joe Eszterhas. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Joe Eszterhas. Show all posts

Joe Eszterhas: The Hollywood Interview

Screenwriter Joe Eszterhas.



JOE ESZTERHAS
IS TELLING NO LIES IN AMERICA
By
Alex Simon


Editor’s Note: This article originally appeared in the October 1997 issue of Venice Magazine.

Joe Eszterhas has been one of Hollywood's top screenwriters for the past fifteen years. The author of such diverse works as Jagged Edge, Music Box, Basic Instinct, Flashdance and Showgirls, Eszterhas is a man of many voices and many lives, his having begun in Hungary in 1944, born in a tiny town near the Austrian border. Eszterhas spent his first six years in German and Austrian refugee camps, emigrating to the U.S. in 1950, settling with his family in Cleveland, Ohio. There, Eszterhas attended Catholic schools and developed an interest in writing. After graduation from Ohio University where he majored in journalism and English, Eszterhas first made a name for himself as a reporter for the Cleveland Plain Dealer and later Rolling Stone, writing what many consider to be the definitive coverage of the aftermath of the Kent State shootings in May of 1970. Eszterhas followed this with a book on the shootings called 13 Seconds, written with Michael D. Roberts. In 1974 Eszterhas wrote Charlie Simpson's Apocalypse, which won a nomination for the National Book Award and gained the attention of a Hollywood producer, who thought the young scribe should try his hand at screenwriting. Eszterhas' first script F.I.S.T., a fictionalized story about a Jimmy Hoffa-type labor leader played by Sylvester Stallone, was produced in 1977. He hasn't stopped working since.

Eszterhas' latest film, his 17th produced, is Telling Lies in America, a semi-autobiographical story about a Hungarian immigrant teenager named Karchy Jonas (Brad Renfro) growing up in Cleveland in the early 1960's. Karchy is an outcast as a scholarship student in his preppy high school, seeking solace in the seemingly glamorous world of rock & roll. When a slick local disc jockey (Kevin Bacon) agrees to take Karchy under his wing, Karchy embarks on a voyage of self-discovery that takes him from being a wide-eyed boy, to a much wiser young man. Directed by Guy Ferland and produced by Banner Entertainment the film also stars Calista Flockhart and Maximilian Schell.Telling Lies is a bittersweet memoir, full of truth, nostalgia and laughter that stings in your throat. It is by far Eszterhas' most personal, and finest work to date.

Among Eszterhas' upcoming projects are the satirical comedy An Alan Smithee Film: Burn Hollywood Burn, Reliable Sources, Evil Empire, and Blaze of Glory, a biopic about the life of singer Otis Redding.

Eszterhas and his wife Naomi, who are expecting their third child soon, sat down recently in their magnificent Malibu home to discuss Joe's remarkable life, past, present and future.

When did you develop an interest in writing and storytelling?
JOE ESZTERHAS: My dad's a writer in the Hungarian language and he's written about 30 Hungarian novels. I grew up on the near-West side of Cleveland, which is a tough, sort of polyglot neighborhood with everyone having their individual turf. Until I was 13 or so, I didn't even read. It was the classic thing of the immigrant kid who comes to the new world, feels his parents are out of touch with the new world and goes in exactly the other direction. So I was really into baseball and rock & roll. There was a lot of bad stuff happening in the neighborhood. It was a time when people had zip guns and knives...and I got into a lot of juvenile trouble. When I was 13, I got into some serious trouble because I hit a kid in the back of the head with a baseball bat who'd been taunting me for a lot of years and was older, calling me names like D.P. (displaced person), Greenhorn...this kept going on for a while. I fought him a couple times, but always lost since he was about four years older than me. Then one time at a baseball game when he was up to bat, I just went up behind him and hit him the back of the head. I went to Juvenile. Went through the whole process. And I realized then that if I kept living the way I had been living, there was no future. And I started to read, read voraciously. Read anything at all. There was this paperback bookstore in my neighborhood, and I'd go down there. The guy liked me and he'd give me the books and I'd bring them back, like a library. And I read anything and everything: Tennessee Williams one day, A.J. Cronin the next day, Steinbeck, Forrester. I fell in love with reading. That's where it really began. I took notes on the books I had read, made lists for myself. I remember one year I went through 300 some books. What happened then is that I stayed off the street. I was petrified about what had happened to the kid that I'd hit. He was in the hospital for something like ten days and there was a period when no one was sure if he was going to survive. The only thing left with neighborhood that I really did was play basketball, which I usually did by myself because I didn't want to mix with the same kids I was with before, because it was all trouble. I just turned to reading completely. After two or three years of that, I thought, wouldn't it be wonderful to tell a story. So I wrote some stories for myself and fell in love with writing. I decided early on to do journalism as a way of making a living in the hopes of eventually writing fiction. It was the old Hemingway school where his theory was that every writer should spend five years doing journalism and not a minute more because those five years would be extremely educational, but if you stayed a minute longer, you'd get totally jaded and lose all of your sensitivity.

What was your beat during your newspaper days?
I was a street reporter. The intent was always that I'd use the experience for some day writing fiction. The political beat or the city hall beat were beauracratized beats, where you weren't really responding to experiences. As a street reporter, I covered whatever happened. From car wrecks, plane crashes, shootings, riots...I was always interested in the human aspects of those things. Then I was a feature writer and wound up getting a Jimmy Breslin-style column. Journalism, in my case, was an amazing training ground, first because I didn't know American society since I was an immigrant and in an ethnic sort of background for much of the time. And two, I was intensely shy as a kid and it was very difficult for me to talk to people. Journalism throws you into all levels of American society and forces you to interact with people.

How did you go from The Plain Dealer to Rolling Stone?
In 1971 I was fired from The Plain Dealer for writing a piece in The Evergreen Review on the My-Lai massacre. It became a huge national case that was about if you are employed by a publication, can you criticize that publication in a different venue if you're still paid by them. I had written as a free-lancer before I was fired in Cleveland, a couple of pieces for Rolling Stone. One of the pieces was on a biker gang shoot-out in Cleveland. After I did this piece, Hunter Thompson wrote me a note that said "Goddammit, now I know there's someone else out there that knows about bikers besides me." (laughs). Hunter, unbeknownst to me, went to (Rolling Stone publisher) Jann (Wenner) and said "I think this guy's a really terrific writer." So it was like a gift from God. Two days after I got fired in Cleveland, I get the call from Rolling Stone saying we'd like you to come out to San Francisco to do a piece on narcotics agents. Can you get a leave? I said "Yeah, no problem pal. I've just been canned!" (laughs) So I went out to San Francisco and met everybody, liked everybody. You have to remember that at the time, this publication was just raising its head from being absolutely underground. I went to Rolling Stone at a time when the closet was filled with shoeboxes full of cash from people sending cash for subscriptions, and we didn't know what the hell to do with it. Finally it got full one day, Jann called the Brink's truck one day and they came in and took it all away! (laughs) It was the very early stages of Rolling Stone. It was the fun stage. It was the kind of period where if you wrote a piece about narcotics agents who were abusive, and many were, and it was about busting kids with a little weed instead of going after the big smack dealers because that was too complicated and they may have been getting paid off. So they'd bust kids for having a little weed, get big headlines and look like heroes, which is total bullshit, right? So I wrote some pieces that brought that out. And when they came out, we had some of the biggest dope dealers in San Francisco coming by the office saying "Hey man, that was a really great story," and bringing us huge bags of dope! The office was filled with huge garbage bags full of marijuana! That's when I was with Rolling Stone. (laughs) We all felt that we were doing something different in journalism that was challenging to the establishment and the journalistic structure. There was hardly any advertising, no holds barred writing. You could have a piece that ran 40,000 words and if it was too long, they'd bump an ad to run the whole story! Imagine that today!

Let's talk about Kent State and your pieces on the killings of the four students by National Guardsmen in May of 1970.
The thing about Kent that I'm really proud of is that I wrote a book on it called 13 Seconds that came out at the same time as a book James Michner wrote on Kent State. The Michner book was a complete whitewash. His book's thesis was that the confrontation between student demonstrators and National Guardsmen had been caused by outside agitators and political radicals and that they were the people at fault. The truth about Kent State was that it was the culmination of months of red-hot rhetoric not only by Richard Nixon, but by James A. Rhodes, the Governor of Ohio, who kept attacking the protesters as "bums" and "lowlifes." The rhetoric had a prevailing psychological affect on everyone in the state, including the guardsmen. So you take a bunch of kids who are 18-21, put them in Kent with gas masks and helmets and guns, and they've been conditioned by this horrendous rhetoric, and suddenly they're there with protesters yelling at them, throwing stones but nothing else. And in the deepest part of themselves, they had bought the fact that these people were radicals, outside agitators, Communists, all that, and they lost it. They opened fire. That they lost it is understandable because they were kids. What got them to the point where it was easier for them to lose it, in my mind, which the Michner book ignored purposely because Michner was, in my mind, a Republican apologist, was that they had been conditioned by the rhetoric from Nixon and James A. Rhodes. I remember doing an hour on the Today show in 1971 with Michner and Izzy Stone, when it was done live. I was just a kid, 27 years old. I'm really proud that I wrote this book because otherwise I think Michner would've gotten away with his incredible whitewash...I covered it as a journalist. I wasn't there the moment of the shootings but I had covered the previous weeks protests and I was there an hour after the shootings, so I knew the build up. It is one of the great tragedies of our time, in my mind.

Tell me about the genesis of Telling Lies in America.
I wrote it around 1984. Everyone passed on it initially. Then through the years, many people started responding to it. Fran Kuzui, who is one of the producers...sometime in the late 80's, got a hold of the script, tried to get the financing for it and just couldn't do it. John Candy at one time wanted to do it, which would have been very interesting...then, ironically what happened is that I forgot about the piece because I don't like to re-read my stuff. Then after I met my wife Naomi, she wanted to read everything I'd written and went on this gigantic hunt.

NAOMI ESZTERHAS: I searched everywhere! Joe didn't have copies of a lot of his old scripts, so I went to studios, agencies, places like Script City...then I read Telling Lies and I told Joe that I couldn't believe it hadn't been made. It's such a wonderful story, so moving.

JOE: What Naomi did that was really cool was get obsessed with the piece in a very lovely, gingerly way...but then what happened was that she kept re-reading it and one day came in and said to me, very lovingly and gingerly, I've got an idea here that the relationship between Karchy (the protagonist) and his dad really isn't explored enough...so I took the script and re-wrote it from page one. So there were a lot of different little things changed. So Fran Kuzui had kept telling people how much she loved this. She and Guy Ferland were friends, she was kind of a mentor to him...Guy read it and said he'd love to direct it. So Guy and I talked. I looked at his film The Babysitter, which I thought had a lot of terrific things in it...then I gave Guy the re-write and felt that he really understood the piece from the inside. So he, Fran and Ben Myron took it to Banner, which was just started out and they agreed to do it for $4 mil, in 20 days for shooting! It's amazing.

I find it interesting that, even at your level, you still have a hard time getting your projects set up.
Oh, constantly! Constantly! I did a piece on Otis Redding two years ago called Blaze of Glory, another spec piece. People warned me, told me it was a tough sell, that nobody knew who the fuck he was. To me, the strength of the story, in addition to the great music, was the relationship between Otis and Phil Walden, who was his manager and his friend. On a whole other level it's about a black man who realizes his blackness and becomes in charge of himself and his company and of his destiny, even though he's begun with a white man who was his friend, which makes it very difficult...so we took the script out, everybody loved it, but nobody wanted to do it! (laughs)

How did you become interested in Otis Redding?
I was the last guy to interview him before he died. I was a young reporter in Cleveland and there was a place called Leo's Casino, which was the only place in Cleveland where people like Otis and Aretha Franklin and Lee Dorsey played. I was always in love with R & B, and that's where it was. And Otis was really sweet to me. We talked for about an hour. The next afternoon I was in the city room when a guy brought the wire up to me. Otis had flown out of Cleveland that afternoon and crashed in that lake in Wisconsin. So I had met the man. I felt this amazing warmth. I listened to his music all the time as the years went by, and I really felt something, so I decided to do it. About six months after we sent it out, Jon Avnet, the director, read it and liked it and we did sell it to Universal, then Jon decided he was going to do something else and the piece was just sort of up in the air. Only in the last couple months has something started to come together again because Iain Softley (Backbeat) wants to do it as his next movie. So it looks like it might finally happen now with Miramax. So to answer your question, is it difficult getting things set up? Oh yeah.

I hear there's a great story about you, Jimi Hendrix and a Hungarian restaurant.
(laughs) Hendrix comes into Cleveland in '69 and at that point is this totally feared, sexual, hot, stunning black person who's got all these young, white women around him. He's playing the Public Auditorium in town and the cops are very nervous. It was the same time that they busted Jim Morrison in Miami (for indecent exposure). So I go back and interview him for The Plain Dealer. What struck me about him was that he was one of the gentlest human beings I'd ever met. He had this wonderful gentleness and warmth that just sort of enveloped you. I talked with him for about an hour. He was there with Chas Chandler and Noel Redding. Jimi says he's hungry and what's good in Cleveland. I suggested this Hungarian restaurant...he sort of looks at these two other guys and says "Okay, cool. Let's go." So I take him to this little Hungarian restaurant on Buckeye road in Cleveland, filled with people in their 60's in black suits, women in babushkas and shit (laughs) and here we come as this fucking limo stops! Jimi gets out, things are dangling, hair is exploding. Here come the other two guys, bopping out! The owner knew me, comes running up "What the fuck are you doing?! Who are these guys?!" And we sit down and have this wonderful, big dinner and he loved it! Then what was funny, after dinner Jimi says "Man, I gotta buy a car. I want a blue Corvette." So Chas makes a couple calls. An hour later we're at a Corvette dealer in Shaker Heights. Jimi picks it right off the floor, hires some guy to drive it down. We go back to the concert and Jimi's in a great mood. We've been smoking dope all afternoon. Jimi does "Purple Haze," then the house lights suddenly go up. There's been a bomb threat! Everybody gets cleared out. I'm not certain to this day whether that was a real bomb threat, or whether the cops were just trying to fuck with him.

The first film of yours that had a big effect on my generation was Flashdance.
I was hired on Flashdance to rewrite the original script by Tom Hedley. A couple stories I remember about that. The lead role was down to three girls: Jenny Beals, Demi Moore, and this New York model named Leslie Wing. They were all terrific. Michael Eisner at the time was the head of Paramount and he had a hard time making up his mind as well. So Michael gathered the toughest, grungiest Teamsters and macho guys on the lot, put 200 of them in a screening room. Michael got up, said "Guys, I'm going to show you three screen tests. The only thing I want to know when they're done is, which one of these women would you really want?" Jenny Beals won hands down! (laughs) The other story is that (director) Adrian Lyne's cut was 40 minutes longer than the theatrical version. Paramount literally took the film away from Adrian and chopped it down to what it now is. If you can imagine taking 40 minutes out of a picture! Adrian's cut was much closer to Fame with that kind of character development than the movie that you saw. Paramount had so little faith in the picture that they sold off 34% of their own rights to the picture to a private investor group, thinking this movie was going to bomb. Those private investors were really lucky! (laughs) The movie wound up doing something like $380 million worldwide.

A lot of your films have dealt with the theme of betrayal: Jagged Edge, Music Box, Betrayed, Basic Instinct. Where does the need to keep exploring this theme come from?
First of all you have to realize that I've written a lot of other scripts in between those, some of which got produced and some which didn't--all with very different themes and of different genres. It's tricky for a screenwriter. A novelist writes what he writes and it's published. If you look at his body of work, you can see everything he's written and his progression. The screenwriter doesn't have the choice of publishing it. The studio either makes it, or not. That's why if you look at four things in a row that a screenwriter has had produced, they might all be of a similar nature or theme, and the assumption is that this is the only theme the writer writes about, when the reality most likely is, these are the sorts of films that the studio is out to make. In terms of the theme itself, it's one I would articulate as 'we don't know the people we love.' And there's part of them we will never know. And I think films like Betrayed, Music Box, Basic Instinct, certainly played off of that theme. I've always been fascinated by the hidden parts of us. I think a close relationship with someone, man or woman, is a lifelong quest to find that hidden part. And unfortunately in most relationships I don't think people do find that hidden part. They don't share it.

Let's go back to Telling Lies. Is it autobiographical?
I've called it figuratively autobiographical. What I mean is, it's always tough to tell how much is and how much isn't because it's a sort of swirl of imagination...parts of it certainly are. The kid certainly reminds me very much of how I was at that age. The insecurity, the false bravado, the desperation to do something and to be somebody when there ain't but a piece of fuckin' evidence that you can be something or be somebody. And underneath all that a terrific fragility of the spirit. I certainly felt all that...there was a lot of prejudice and ugliness in my school, too. I was one of the six poor kids who stayed together at one table all four years while everyone else just sort of pissed on them. And this was not just among the students. The brothers fostered it also. I remember brothers saying "Oh look, Joe's got a new pair of pants today," in front of the whole class, you know? I remember my father, who was making hardly any money, being brought into the school by the principal who told him he was one of the few fathers who hasn't contributed to some fund, and why was this. My father tried to explain that he was very poor and the priest said to him, "Yes your son's here on scholarship, but that doesn't mean you have to behave like a bum with us."

Don't you think that most artists have a hard time fitting in from an early age? You're thinking and feeling things that most of your peers simply don't think and feel.
Yeah, I think if you're off the beaten path in any way it's always tough. I've been off the beaten path my whole life. You can say it's "artistry" although I admit it's a word that scares the living fuck out of me, "artist."

Why?
Well, I always say I do the best that I can at what I do, which is writing and if other people want to use that word, fine. But I have great trouble with it in terms of self-definition simply out of humility, I think. It's one hell of a word to live up to. Maybe it's my background, having grown up blue collar with a lot of people who work with their hands.

It sounds like you had some tough times in high school. Did you ever go back to any class reunions?
No, I haven't. It was too painful. We've been getting these things 'Please come back and be our speaker,' that kind of stuff. When we showed Telling Lies for the first time at the Cleveland film festival last March, this guy came up to me after it was over and said "Joe, it's Marty...Do you remember me?" And he'd just seen the film. I said "Yeah, I remember you." He was one of the guys who'd given me a hard time. He paused and said "I'm sorry." (Pause) It was very telling. A terrific moment.

Eric Idle: The Hollywood Interview

Comic actor Eric Idle.



ERIC IDLE:
ALAN SMITHEE'S FLAMING PYTHON
By
Alex Simon


Editor’s Note: This article originally appeared in the March 1998 issue of Venice Magazine.

Eric Idle is regarded as one of the fathers of cutting edge comedy. As a member of the legendary Monty Python troupe of TV, stage and film fame, Idle has been keeping the world in fits of side-splitting laughter for nearly 30 years. Born March 29, 1943 in South Shields, Durham, England, Idle began his comedy career while at Cambridge, where he joined the school's legendary Footlights revue, along with future Python John Cleese. After graduating Cambridge, Idle wrote for BBC Radio's I'm Sorry I'll Read That Again, before moving to TV writing for The Frost Report, Marty Feldman and The Two Ronnies. Do Not Adjust Your Set, a children's show for Thames Television, led to the ground-breaking Monty Python's Flying Circus television show for the BBC, which ran from 1969-74. Along with fellow Pythons Cleese, Michael Palin, Terry Jones, and the late Graham Chapman, Idle and the Flying Circus helped bring a new brand of humor to the airwaves, one that combined absurdity, social satire, surrealism, animation and spam. The world has yet to recover from their inspired lunacy.

Five Python feature films followed the TV series: And Now for Something Completely Different (1971), Monty Python and the Holy Grail (1975), the hugely (and absurdly) controversial Biblical satire Monty Python's Life of Brian (1979), Monty Python Live at the Hollywood Bowl (1982), and Monty Python's The Meaning of Life (1983). In addition to the films, the Pythons released several hit records, books, three CD-ROMs and even a popular web site (PythOnline).

Post-Python Idle has kept busy. He has appeared in many other films (Splitting Heirs, Nuns on the Run), had his own TV series (Rutland Weekend Television), written a novel called "Hello Sailor," a comedy book ("The Rutland Dirty Weekend Book"), and a play which ran in London's West End for five months called Pass the Butler.

1998 finds Idle nominated for a Grammy for Best Audio, for reading his Dove Kids book "The Quite Remarkable Adventures of the Owl and the Pussycat." At the upcoming Aspen Comedy Festival on March 7, the Pythons will re-unite for a Q & A and be presented with an award for their outstanding achievements in the world of humor. His newest novel, "Levity, or The Road to Mars" will be published by Vintage Books this fall.

On the screen, Idle stars in the outrageous comedy Burn Hollywood Burn, from the prolific pen of Joe Eszterhas. The film, presented as a mock-documentary, satirizes the making of a big-budget Hollywood action epic. Idle plays a director named Alan Smithee. When his big action epic goes over-budget and the producers force him to make changes that he's against, Smithee realizes that he can't take his name off the final product, because it just happens to be the same as the pseudonym used by the Director's Guild for any director who doesn't want credit for his work! Smithee, in desperation, steals the negative of the film before any prints can be struck and therein the chaos ensues. The film co-stars Ryan O'Neal, Richard Jeni, rappers Coolio and Chuck D., as well as a host of Hollywood royalty making cameos or playing themselves including Sylvester Stallone, Whoopi Goldberg, Jackie Chan, Robert Evans, Shane Black, and Dominic Dunne, to name a few.

In person, Eric Idle is every bit the delightful loon one would expect him to be, constantly inspiring those around him to laugh at life. Having moved to "this side of the pond" several years ago with his wife and young daughter, Eric sat down in a Four Seasons hotel suite recently to reflect on his remarkable career as one of the world's funniest men. Between the fits of laughter, here's what transpired:

Most comedians say that their humor stems from painful childhoods. How was yours?
Eric Idle: My childhood was a piece of shit. I was orphaned by the RAF at the age of two and I was shoved into a boarding school at seven for twelve years. "So you became a comedian, how odd!" (laughs)

Were you a funny kid, interested in dramatics and things like that?
I guess so. I was into puppeting a bit. Writing and performing sketches and so on, which is really what Python is: writing sketches and then donning masks and disguises...I guess I started doing that about 11 or 12. In boarding school, remember, you have all these extra hours in the day, because even when you're not in school, you're still in school! (laughs) So there were always things that you wanted to do to fill in your time. There was no TV then to sit and gawk into. You had to find different ways of filling in time. I guess one of them was reading, which always been great...I think I'd always been funny because being funny is a wonderful defense against bullying, of which there was an enormous amount, as well as institutionalized bullying was very big. You were beaten. It was a very Victorian sort of boarding school. And then you get to be a bully yourself as you move up the system.

So were you a bully yourself?
I tried not to be. I was protesting to the headmaster, "Ban the bomb" and all that. That was my way of protesting against the system. But you could even be beaten by the kids in our school. They could "slipper" you. Masters had the privilege of hitting you with a cane. It was very Tom Brown. We were all war orphans. It's interesting, I met a journalist earlier today who went to the same school...but I've had no contact with anyone from that period since.

From there you went to Cambridge?
Yes, at the age of 19 and that was just wonderful. They had this wonderful thing called The Footlights, which I got involved in and that was a wonderful club and experience to be in...That's where I met John Cleese and it pretty much took over the rest of my life at Cambridge. We were always performing, doing cabarets and sketches. That was the only way to be in the club, was to perform. You had to audition and then be voted in by the members.

Where did the rest of the Pythons come from?
Graham Chapman was from Cambridge. Mike and Terry were from Oxford and I'd met them during two consecutive summers at the Edinburgh Festival. At the end of the year we'd always take the revue up there...so I must've met Terry in '63 and Michael in '64. And (Terry) Gilliam (their frequent director/animator who went on to direct The Fisher King, among other films), who's American, appeared out of the blue when we were doing a kids' show called Do Not Adjust Your Set. This weird chap came in and said "Well, I've written some sketches." Mike and Terry said "We write the sketches. We don't need any bloody Yank writing our sketches!" (laughs) And I said "No, wait a minute. This guy is good. I don't know why, but there's something about him." So they said "All right, then" and they let him in. (laughs)

So you went straight from Cambridge to Television?
Radio and television. It was just after the big satire boom, so they were on the look-out for young, smart, agreeable, cheap people who could write from Cambridge. (laughs) Then we did a bit of writing for various shows and they asked if we'd like to do the kids' show and we did, and then they were going to offer us our own show for late in the night. Then Cleese came across with Chapman from Marty Feldman's show and said "Look, I've got this other offer from the BBC." We said that we'd gotten an offer from ITV, the other network. Cleese said "Well, we're secured for 13 (shows). It's for certain." So we agreed and the two shows melded.

The format of the kids' show was similar to that of Python?
Very similar. We had a band on the show called the Bonzo Dog Do-Da Band, who were real loonies. They did very wild, sort of send-ups of Hollywood 30's and 40's music. Up to that point we were fairly straight-laced Oxbridge students and I think they sort of skirted us left a bit. They introduced a whole new level of pop culture and 60's madness.

What was it like when you went to the BBC and did your first Flying Circus? Were you all viewed as these completely insane anarchists?
The BBC didn't really know who we were or what we were, and didn't really care in those days. It was a bit like the RAF: "Alright you, you go over there and that's your room over there and we'll see you at the end of the season. Jolly good. Carry on." And it was great. We had no executives. No help or interference. They gave us a loony director called Ian McNaughton, who'd been working for Spike Milligan...he was wild and wacky. We knew what we didn't want to do and that's all we knew. We didn't want to end sketches with tags and punchlines. We didn't want to cut to the singer, "And now on a serious note..." "And now for something completely different..." was something you always heard on comedy shows. "And now for something completely different, here in a relaxing mood, is Vera to sing 'The Dance of the Seventeen Veils.'" (laughs) And I remember our first show very well actually, because the BBC refused to accept our first four titles, which were A Horse, a Spoon and a Basin; Bunwacky Buzzard, Stubble and Boot; Owls Stretching Time. They kept saying "No! You cannot call the show Owls Stretching Time!" You know, duh! (laughs) So finally, they kept calling it The Circus. "Maybe The Flying Circus," they said. Then we came up with the name 'Monty Python.' So they sent out tickets and people came thinking they were actually seeing a circus! We had little old ladies making up our first audience. (little old lady voice) "Oh, is this a circus?" "I dunno, I don't see any animals." (laughs) They were totally puzzled. And I was quite puzzled, too. Because if you look at the first show, it's totally bizarre! I mean, sheep drop on people's heads...I used to play soccer in the park on Sundays and the show went out on Saturday nights. So on Sunday they'd go "That show of yours is bloody weird, but I quite like. But it's really a very stupid bloody, silly show!" (laughs)

What was the genesis of the name 'Monty Python'?
The BBC always put "Circus" on the contract, so we deflated it by saying "Flying Circus." And I think it was Michael who said he wanted to call it Gwen Dibbly's Flying Circus because there was a real woman in his village called Gwen Dibbly. (laughs) And wouldn't it be funny if we named a television show after her? We were like, 'Alright, that's funny for you, Mike." So John and Graham came up with "Python" because they always liked animal jokes. And I came up with "Monty" because he was a bloke in the pub where I went in Stratford. "Has Monty been in yet?" "Hello! Where's Monty?" And he wore a bow-tie and he was like, an agent, and the name had this sort of seedy quality 'Monty Python.' It has a sort of persona, almost very Goddot. Waiting for Monty. (laughs)

Did you guys write all your sketches together, like in a round table?
No. Mike and Terry wrote together. John and Graham wrote together and I wrote alone. We'd go away for like, two weeks, get a block of stuff, then get together for two or three days and read it all out. And if you laughed, it was in and if you didn't, we sold it to The Two Ronnies. (laughs)

Did the show take off right away?
Well, it's not like here with ratings. It's the BBC, so they don't care if nobody's watching. We were only competing with ITV anyway...so it wasn't measured like that. It was never really a hugely popular thing. I guess it got bigger. Here was where it got big, when it finally came here, about 1974 or so. PBS is going to run the whole series again for the 25th anniversary, I think starting this April.

Tell us about Python's first excursion into feature films.
Well we started with And Now For Something Completely Different, which we did for £80,000. Then we did Holy Grail for £200,000, or about $400,000. I actually like Grail better than Life of Brian. I think it's more filmic and weird. It's not the general opinion of the whole group, but that's what I think...We were on such a tight budget with Grail, sharing rooms together. We couldn't afford horses, so that's how we got the things with the coconuts banging together. (laughs) That's how things happen. We actually raised money privately for that, from Pink Floyd and Led Zeppelin and Charisma Records...They were fans. And of course George Harrison picked up the tab for Life of Brian. It worked out well, really. We shot Brian in Tunisia where Sir Lew Grade had just made The Life of Christ, so we used their sets!

Did the uproar surrounding Brian surprise you?
We thought it was rather good. Saved us from doing publicity. (laughs) It was a wonderful American controversy. Once you're on the news, you're fine. You can go home now. You don't have to do a publicity tour. Oh, thank you very much. (laughs)

Who were Python's biggest influences?
I'd say it was a bit of the Goon Show (Peter Sellers and Spike Milligan) and a bit of Beyond the Fringe, which was Peter Cook, Dudley Moore, Jonathan Miller and Alan Bennett. They did this wonderful revue around '62. It was really fun.

You hosted Saturday Night Live four times during its heyday in the 1970's.
What was that like?

It was fairly chaotic. You always felt that the hours were written around Lorne (Michaels) desire not to get up before lunch and stay up all night and have a bit of fun. (In Python) we always worked office hours, start at 10, 10:30, break for lunch, then finish around 4:30. And they would sort of start after dinner, then go to five or six in the morning. They would never re-write, so they'd never stockpile stuff, you know what I mean? (On SNL) sometimes if they had a sketch, and we liked the first bit, we'd throw it across to somebody else, who would just complete it or stick it into something else. So we always had the opportunity to re-work things...But sometimes you'd have a panic as to whether they were going to have a monologue ready or not.

I remember that great sketch you did with Dan Aykroyd, as David Frost interviewing Nixon.
I wrote that! And I didn't get writing credit, which really pissed me off. Lorne said, "Well we don't have any budget for this sort of thing. I'm afraid we can't give you writing credit." "Well, that's okay. Alright, then. Oh, never mind." "You understand?" "Yes of course, it is only NBC, isn't it? I couldn't possibly have any money." (laughs) But the show was always the opposite of Python. It was about ego, celebrity, and fame! Fame in New York! Yeah, here we are! Yeah! And Python was about...nobody knew who the fuck we were. We never put our names up until the end credits, and even then it didn't say who played what. So it was sort of the opposite, but interesting though. For me it was good because it led to The Rutles.

The Rutles was the Beatles satire you did with Gary Weis. Tell us about that.
I had my own TV show after Python called Rutland Weekend Television. Rutland was a county in England which the Conservatives put out of existence after a thousand years of history. It's back now, I'm glad to say! (laughs) So we gave it its own TV station and The Rutles was just a sketch on that. When I first did Saturday Night Live I was asked to bring some stuff over. We played it over the air and the response was huge. People wrote in to The Rutles. "Dear Nasty, Stig and Barry," you know. So they asked me, "What are you doing next?" And I said I wanted to make a documentary about The Rutles. George (Harrison) was very encouraging and I was going to do it for the BBC. They said, "Well come and do it for NBC. We'll give you a bigger budget." So we sold it to NBC and Lorne suggested Gary Weis as co-director with me and...just went away and did it, really. I started in New York where I interviewed Paul Simon and Mick Jagger about The Rutles, which was nice to get under your belt, because Mick's really bitchy about The Beatles in their thinly-veiled disguise as he tells his stories. (laughs)And those rivalries don't die. There's extraordinary British band rivalries that are still going on.

It pre-dated Spinal Tap, didn't it?
Yes! I invented the mocu-mentary! It pre-dated Zelig , which is another one that gets credited (with being the first). But I'm not bitter or twisted. (laughs) I'm just broke. (laughs)

Do you have any favorite sketches from Flying Circus?
You know, I liked the Bruces. I really enjoyed them. I had sketches I loved performing on the stage show. I loved doing the Travel Agent, which was written by John and Graham. There's still a lot of good stuff that plays well.

Have you all stayed close?
Yes, we've all stayed close and we still meet and see each other. It's fun.

Will you ever work together again?
No. We've been tempted. Occasionally I've thought about Vegas. I thought that Monty Python live in Las Vegas would be a real trip. Basically I don't think we should do it, even for ready-money. It's disappointing ultimately. You hear people say "They want you, they want you, they want you!" What they want is how you were. We can't go back. And I think what it really is, is that they want to go back. I think it's okay for us all to turn up and sort of reminisce and have people say "Oh, look at those old bastards still natchin' away." I think that's okay. But I think people like to know that we're all still friends and really the shows are all better than we could be. We don't age. We're still 26. And they still find the new markets. It's extraordinary.

Tell us about your new novel "Levity, or The Road to Mars."
It's been something I've been trying to write for 16 or 18 years, and I just finally figured out what it was about. I'm proud of it. It's been fun and very nice to get away from film writing, which can drive you mad with their notes, listening to them while you pretend that you're impressed. But that's the way it is. I went to (famous comedy director) once for a meeting and he said "So, have you ever done comedy?" (laughs)...But the book is about comedy and comedians, which is sort of the only thing I know after all these years. I found it really a fabulous job. It's nice when someone just says to you "You know, I love what you're doing. I'm going to pay you to finish it." More of those jobs, please! What I miss about Python is that freedom and that liberty we had to do whatever we wanted. And when you write a novel, you have that liberty back. It's given me a new lease on my love of writing. Of course day to day, writing is fucking hell. But generally, compared to being an actor stuck in a trailer for 18 hours, it's wonderful because you're constantly searching within yourself for something. Only rarely can you do acting that even begins to touch what you can get into with writing.

Tell us about Alan Smithee.
I thought it was a good script. When I read a script I go "Can I play this or can I have fun playing this." And this was good because, unlike "comedy," this was real. There was a real move in his character. When we were filming, my mother was dying. And we brought her back here to my house to die. And I had to spend three or four days sort of crying and weeping in the story. So it was very therapeutic for me...So for me it was a really good acting role because you didn't have to be shallow. Usually in comedy, you've got it in take two or three because where are you going to go? You're not going to give more depth to it. So it was good for me to do it.

Did the film reflect a lot of truths that you've learned from your years in "the biz"?
Well, I used to be very bitter and cynical, but now I think the mistake that I made and that other people make is expecting it to be anything other than it is, which is Detroit. They're making cars, they're not making fabulous little art films. If you want to make fabulous little art films, go live in France or Germany where they pay you to do that. Here it's about making a certain type of film. A lot of people's expectations are dashed because they're looking for the wrong thing.

Labels